History the is fake! :: essays research papers

WAR IMMINENT: Spain and America to Fight After a recent publication in our sister publication, the New York Journal, a letter from the Spanish Minister de Lome to President McKinley, tensions rose to a point of combustion. Citizens all over the United States have complained about the insulting message contained within the letter from the Minister. This letter ridiculed McKinley, and lead to the eventual resignation of this Spanish Minister de Lome. Another catalyst that added to growing American distaste for the Spanish was the destruction of the battleship, the USS Maine. Although the source remains unknown for sure, we’re positive here at The Chronicle that the dastardly Spaniards committed this heinous crime. Many valuable American lives, as well as other less valuable foreign lives, were lost due to the explosion onboard the gunship. This blatant attack   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  on an American Naval vessel is definite grounds for a war with the Spaniards. In response to the att ack on the Maine, the United States Congress has raised an emergency fund of $50 million for President McKinley to do with as he pleases in order to fight the war that they declared also following the destruction of the Maine. Congress, through this declaration of war, desired to repay the indignation bestowed upon the US by Spain and to also help free the Spanish colonies of Guam, Cuba, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico. The main catalyst that escalated this war was very much to the â€Å"Yellow Journalism† produced by such newspapers such this one, but also by others such as the New York Journal, the San Francisco Chronicle, and even by very reputable newspapers like the New York Times.

Roosevelt and the Great Depression Essay -- History Politics Historica

Roosevelt and the Great Depression The Great Depression of the 1930’s was a great blow to America especially after the seeming prosperity of the twenties. The depression was a result not of false prosperity in the twenties, although the distribution of wealth was very uneven the affluence was very real, but rather from a lack of economic and political maturity to address the problems either before 1929 or as a cure post 1929. The Great Depression is often seen as a result of the twenties when rather it was a failure of the thirties. If the necessary policies had been drawn up in the twenties there would have been widespread hatred for these policies by the wealthy ruling class. This would have made them impossible to implement. It is only during the depression that they became a remote political possibility. Since most of these measures were never tried by either Hoover or Roosevelt we can only speculate as to the level of political acceptance such measures would have encountered. Roosevelt's main measure in combating the Great Depression was the implementation of the New Deal. When Roosevelt excepted the presidential nomination he said â€Å"I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people†. The New Deal, which was never clearly defined, became the label for the measures undertaken to combat the depression. This New Deal sparked off one of the most concentrated bursts of legislation in American history. In 1933 Roosevelt took up office in the face of an economic crisis. Massive unemployment had swept the country and a banking sector in crisis. â€Å"The New Deal was already in the oven, only half-baked, but it had to be served quickly† it was perhaps for this reason that the barrage of legislation lacked a cohe... ... reversing the policy of fiscal conservatism into one of increased defence spending which brought a boom to many industries. Many of the gains of Roosevelt’s actions are in the long term. Even though many of his government agencies ceased to exist some key reforms were made, especially with regard welfare and the banking sector. The New Deal, though of dubious economic value, set in motion long-range trends toward governmental expansion and modernisation. Works Cited: Burns, J.M. 1956, Roosevelt the Lion and the Fox 1882-1940: Volume One, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York Conkin, P.H. 1968, The New Deal, Routledge American History, London. Graham, O.L. 1967, An Encore for Reform: The Old Progressives and The New Deal, Oxford University Press, New York. Hill, C.P. & Fell, G.H. (eds), 1975, Franklin Roosevelt and the New Deal, Edward Arnold, London

Analysis of Invisible Man Essay -- Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man

Ralph Ellison wrote the book Invisible Man in the summer of 1945, while on sick leave from the Merchant Marines. Invisible Man is narrated in the first person by an unnamed African American who sees himself as invisible to society. This character is perceived and may be inspired by Ellison himself. Ellison manages to develop a strong philosophy through this character and portrays his struggle to search for his identity. He uses metaphors throughout the book of his invisibility and the blindness of others in which is a part of the examination of the effects of racism. The development of this unnamed â€Å"Afro-American† character helps set the foundation on the philosophy of understanding who he is. The narrator undergoes experiences such as the battle royal, the Tuskegee Institute, the Trueblood visit, and the blueprint seller in which is full of corruption and deceit. In the prologue, the narrator introduces himself as an â€Å"Invisible Man†. He lives in a basement of an apartment building that only allows white tenants. He describes how he steals electricity from the Monopolated Light a...

An Analysis of My Personality Type

Your main points and each step are clear but you did not label them correctly. Good observations, points and outcomes documented throughout the paper. Conclusions/Summary References/Citations (4) Good job/ Citations throughout each section Spelling/Grammar Good job/ Be sure to use active voice page Count/l_MIT (4) 20 PAP Format/Errors See PAP comments throughout the paper Overall Comments: Very Good paper! This paper has demonstrated that you understand the core objectives and learning outcomes for this assignment and the meaning of your personal assessment.Remember that graduate level writing is a continuous improvement process. A solid best practice is writing a paper and then putting it down and reading it when you are fresh. You will often pick up small mistakes by doing this. Fix some of the little mistakes found in this paper and you will strengthen your work on future assignments. It is evident you paid attention to getting your paper right†¦ You are doing graduate level writing. Enjoyed reading your work †¦ Great job! This paper discusses my personal results of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test.It also details how analyzing and understanding personality types is relevant to organizational behavior. The first section of this paper details and discusses the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. Each specific personality preference is analyzed and validated based on my type and temperament. Examples from my personal and professional life are utilized during the validation. The second section off this paper addresses what have learned about the Myers-Briggs and Jung Typology personality tests and how this knowledge can be used by an employee, co-worker, and manager of an organization .Seem,'rods: personality, type, organizational behavior Richard Nixon once said, â€Å"Don't try to take on a new personality; it doesn't work† (â€Å"Quotes on Personality', 2014). Bel ieve that this is excellent advice. Instead of trying to develop a new personality, perhaps people should learn to better understand the personality that they have. After taking the Myers- Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I have a better understanding of my own personality and also the personality traits of other people around me.In the first section of this paper I will detail and discuss the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. In the second section of this paper I will explain how what I learned about personality types relates to organizational behavior and how it will help me be a better employee, co-worker, and manager. Aspects of My Personality Type After taking both the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I was classified with the Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging (1ST J) personality type.SITS personality types are considered quiet reserved people who are loyal, faithfu l, and dependable (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). They tend to express a strong sense of duty and commitment and are recently very serious individuals (â€Å"Jung Typology Test†, 2014). Gist's believe in laws and traditions and they are generally conservative in nature (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In the following paragraphs will discuss the validity of the different letters of my personality type and how they specifically relate to me.Introvert Preference On the Jung Typology Test, I scored a distinct preference of 67% introversion over extroversion. As an introvert, I tend to focus within myself for satisfaction. Frequently I have to force myself to interact with people in a social setting. I rarely enjoy hanging out in large groups of people. I prefer to spend time alone and would consider myself a â€Å"home body'. When I do go out, it is usually to a place where I don't have to interact with people on a personal level.Sitting in a dark movie theatre wi th my family or eating dinner at a restaurant are perfect examples of a low threat social setting. Throughout my life I have always had 1 or 2 deep friendships as opposed to a large group of friends. An occasional weakness with introverts is they are sometimes reel octant to work with others (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In my professional life, I am not quite as introverted. As a military member and manager of people, I have to interact with my subordinates and peers on a daily basis in order to facilitate mission accomplishment.Sensing Preference With a sensing presence of 62%, according to the Jung Typology Test, I seem to conform to approximately 70% of the U. S. Population regarding this preference (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). Sensors are defined as individuals that prefer to get their information in a literal way from their 5 senses as opposed to getting information in a figurative way like an intuitive arson would (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). In bo th my personal and professional life prefer to deal in facts and live by a set of rules. As a 25 year military veteran, have been conditioned to respond and react exactly this way.I tend to rely on my experiences to help me analyze the specifics as they are presented to me. A major weakness with my preference for sensing is that sometimes refuse to look at things from another perspective. Thinking In this measured area of the Jung Typology Test, I demonstrated a clear propensity for the thinking preference with a rating of 88%. As a manager in he military profession, pride myself on my ability to be objective, fair and firm. As a supervisor I frequently make difficult decisions and firmly believe that it is more important to be respected than liked. Always try to look at things from a logical perspective and try not to let my personal feelings get in the way of my decisions. One down side with the thinking preference is that it is possible to forget about the people perspective when you are making decisions (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). Judging Preference The judging preference was my most definitive personality preference with rating of 100% on the Jung Typology Test. In my military profession I live by a schedule, make decisive judgments, and always try to follow the established rules and regulations. Onto like to wait until the last minute to do things. I am also very conservative and regulated in my approach to my personal and professional life. One weakness of my overwhelmingly strong judging preference is that frequently have little patience with people that are procrastinators, poor planners, or unable to make decisions. SITS Personality with a SO Temperament People with SITS personalities are considered internally focused individuals ho exhibit; strong senses of duty, good organizational skills, are driven to succeed, are honest, and value their integrity (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014).My temperament is a Sensing Judging (SO). SO temperaments desire to be associated with significant institutions or organizations (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). As a Non-commissioned Officer in the united States Air Force this makes perfect sense. I enjoy the daily challenges associated with being an administrator and manager. I have a deep respect for the chain of command within my organization, and pride myself on being reliable. A active byproduct is that in my personal life my SO temperament can sometimes be overwhelming for my children because I tend to be a task master.Relating Personality Types to Organizations After reading Type Talk at Work, I have a greater knowledge of the 16 different personality types and how they relate to organizational behavior. As a manager in an organization, it is essential that I am able to calculate the internal strengths and weaknesses of my employees (Fisher, 2012). Understanding how to analyze an individual based on their personality type can be of enormous benefit to me as a super visor. Throughout my years as an enlisted manager in the IIS Air Force, I have learned that each individual is different and you have to manage them accordingly.For example; if I have to assign someone as training instructor, probably would look for an extrovert over an introvert. Since having someone who is comfortable speaking in front of people would be vital for this position, an extrovert personality would be a better choice. Motivation is also different based on personality. Extroverts enjoy being rewarded in public, while introverts might prefer a more low key setting. As a manager it is also important for me to understand how my own personality type effects my management style.As a SITS personality type, occasionally have a tendency to dismiss the perspectives of others. I also am a very â€Å"by the book† manager. Understanding the weaker characteristics of my personality type will help me to control them so they don't corrupt my ability to manage my organization (â €Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). Reading and learning about the 16 different personality types has been very enlightening from a personal and professional perspective. Understanding he four different personality preferences and how they work together to make up my personality will benefit me throughout my life.

Factors Motivating Variation

The section â€Å"Factors motivating variation† of Chapter 2 of Introducing Sociolinguistics (Meyerhoff 2006) introduces four social factors that motivated people how to use language. Meyerhoff provides a rough introduction on these factors that would be discussed deeply in latter chapters. The first factor is speakers desire to show how to join in a group and separate from others. That means people use language to identify which group they belong to. Meyerhoff uses the Martha’s vineyard study to explain that vineyarder used different pronunciation to distinguish themselves from summer visitor.The specific linguistic variant is an identification to separate local group and visitor group. The second factor is speakers desire to be valuable in their group. Meyerhoff explains speaker use specific variant to raise their self image in the community, then to establish a positive image in their community. On the other hand, speakers desire to eliminate the negative by avoiding using a variant which their image would be downgraded. These three factors motivate speakers determine how to use language to achieve a â€Å"good† identity in the society.Compare to the other three factors, the final one is focused on the interaction between the speaker and group members. Meyerhoff states the speakers desire to test how in-group members are orienting themselves to those three factors. Communication accommodation theory is introduced to explain this factor in generally. It presents that the speakers depend on audience behaviors to choose the variant. Besides that the speakers will use language to test their hypotheses are workable or not. Therefore, variation is a result after these testing.

Examine The Ambiguity Of The Play S Conclusion Essay

When the audience does not receive a rounded story, and causality is being blurred the effect of a play can be unsettling, suggesting the presence of an unsolved situation. Although in the case of Death And The Maiden ambiguity is used in an unusual, opposite way where the created effect is best described by calmness and acquiescence. Does Paulina kill Roberto, or does she let him stay alive? Is Roberto really there in the theatre or is he just a fantasy? Leaving these questions open is very provocative. For the first sight the reader might feel intimidated, that the  foundations for any interpretation are removed, there are so few facts to start from. Because as he might discovered from the context before there is a symbolism, that one can associate characters with the people of post Pinochet Chile, or people of any country in a state of healing. But then how does this symbolism work? It does not say too much about the ways of reconciliation, and what is more that even if it does so it feels like an analytical dead end. Because it says that no matter in what ways you try to set yourself free of trauma, by revenge or by forgiveness the outcome will be the same, Roberto or his phantom  will always be there. This provocative nature of ambiguity forces the reader to look for new explanations. And where is the solution to be found if not in the book’s yet least understood part, in its title. What is death and the maiden for the reader? It can be the Schubert piece, or a motif that manifests itself in arts and literature from the medieval ages. But most importantly it is the motif for the universal presence of death. And suddenly all makes sense, Dorfman does not intend to intimidate the reader azzal, hogy azt mondja nincs megoldas a tramumaval valo megkuzdesre.

Favorite Teacher

Hi! My name is Ameha Tsegai. My favorite teacher is Mrs. Magnusen. She is my favorite teacher because she has done a lot for me. She always makes teaching fun and easy. The students in her class learn faster because the way she teaches. I learn fast too because I am also in her class. She is a special teacher, and she is very nice and kind. She is a good teacher because she always makes sure everybody learned the lesson. If one student does not understand the lesson, she carefully teaches them until they understand it before moving on. She does that because she is trying to make sure every body in our class passes the CRCT. She is a really awesome teacher. She is my math and science teacher. I love those two subjects for two reasons. The first reason I like those two subjects is because their real interesting and fun; the second reason is because she teaches it! Another reason Mrs. Magnusen is my favorite teacher is because she knows my family and culture really well. She has also tried the cultural food that the people in the country that my parents were born make. Anyway, she is a one of a kind teacher. She is because she actually cares about if the students completely understand the lesson. Some teachers just teach the lesson and let the book teach them. Mrs. Magnusen goes beyond that point and does most of it on the board, while she’s explaining it. Mrs. Magnusen likes giving extra help to students. When a lot of students need extra help she goes on the computer, finds something that explains our lesson, and pulls it up on the promethean board. That actually helps the students in our class because it explains the lesson step-by-step. The students can take notes on what the board is saying and study it for the next test. That way more students could pass the tests. Mrs. Magnusen also makes the class laugh. That is another good reason for her to be your favorite teacher. Sometimes in the classroom she makes jokes while no one expects it. I have one more favorite teacher. Her name is Mrs. Goff. She is also generous and kind. Her and Mrs. Magnusen are a lot alike.